NYC Man Tries to Rob 6 Banks in 5 Days, Gets Away With Only $605

NYC Man Tries to Rob 6 Banks in 5 Days, Gets Away With Only $605

A five-day bank robbery spree across New York City has left police searching for a suspect and the public scratching its head. The alleged robber, Gustavo DeJesus Torres, 33, is accused of targeting six banks in less than a week, only to walk away with a total of just $605 (approximately ₹56,683).

For a crime often associated with high stakes and high rewards, this case stands out for the opposite reason: remarkably low returns.

What Happened During the New York Bank Robbery Spree?

According to reporting by The New York Times, the spree began when Torres entered a branch of JPMorgan Chase and handed a teller a note implying that violence could occur if money wasn’t handed over.

Over the next five days:

Despite the frequency of the attempts, the outcomes were inconsistent—and often unsuccessful.

How Much Did He Actually Get?

The total haul from the spree: $605.

Breakdown of reported robberies:

In half the attempts, Torres allegedly walked away empty-handed. In one case, the amount taken barely covered the cost of a New York meal.

Why so little?

Several factors could explain the unusually low sums:

How Police Identified the Suspect

Investigators were able to identify Torres through surveillance footage.

One particularly telling image shows him:

The image was captured during a narrow 57-minute window between two robbery attempts—one unsuccessful and one that yielded $265.

According to the New York City Police Department, in several cases:

“The individual did not obtain any money and fled on foot to parts unknown.”

This pattern suggests a lack of planning—or at least execution—compared to more sophisticated bank robbery cases.

Was This a Pattern? A Look at His Past

Authorities believe Torres may not be new to this type of crime.

Prior incidents linked to the suspect:

The similarities are notable:

What remains unclear is what happened after the 2021 arrest and whether any legal consequences followed.

Why This Case Is Unusual

Bank robberies in the U.S. have been declining over the years, and when they do occur, they often follow predictable patterns. This case breaks several of those norms.

1. High frequency, low payoff

Six attempts in five days is unusually aggressive—but the total earnings were strikingly low.

2. Minimal sophistication

There’s no indication of:

3. Repeated targeting of the same bank

Returning to the same institution multiple times increases the risk of identification and arrest.

What This Says About Modern Bank Security

Ironically, the case may highlight how effective bank security systems have become.

Key deterrents in play:

Banks are designed to minimise losses during robberies—often complying with demands but restricting access to large sums. That may explain why even “successful” attempts yielded so little.

The Bigger Picture: Crime vs. Reward

From a purely economic standpoint, this spree underscores a stark reality: traditional bank robbery is no longer a lucrative crime.

Compare:

That imbalance may help explain why financial crime has increasingly shifted toward cyber fraud and digital scams, where potential returns are significantly higher.

Where the Investigation Stands

As of now:

Given the visibility of the case and the clear photographic evidence, it may only be a matter of time before an arrest is made.

TL;DR

Exit mobile version